From: ur-valhalla!cruz.com!god-rosa (Gerald O'Docharty)
Subject: On attraction and repulsion
Message-ID: <199510130435.AA18025@cruz.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 1995 21:35:26 -0700

->  SearchNet's   neotech   Mailing List

Note: I have posted this text elswhere previously with only minor
revisions made to this version.
------------------------------------------------------------------

Push? Pull? When it comes to understanding magnetism, gravity,
electrostatic attraction, etc., push or pull is irrelevant. Lets take
magnetism. When UNLIKE poles are juxtaposed, a force is established
that tends to move the magnets together if they are free to move. We
could say they are pulling each other. We could say they are being
pushed together. This misses the whole point. This is only one example
of the expression of the principle of MOTION, any motion.

The law of attraction and repulsion is what lies behind all motion.
We take ordinary everyday motion totally for granted. We move objects
about all day and never wonder as to what principle enables us to do
so. Magnetism is no different than any other force in principle. It
only appears unique because it seemingly is a force operating at a
distance with no intervening connection.

All objects EXIST AS a BALANCE of forces.  Their position relative to
one another is due to a balance of forces. Any push force also has a
comlementary pull force. Even the use of the terms push or pull is
misleading because one cannot exist without the other. What about
gravity? Same thing, if it can pull then there is also an associated
push. The objects are pulled together at the sides facing each other
while being pushed together at the sides facing away from each other.

The law of attraction and repulsion which can be simply stated as
"Like repels like, and attracts unlike,"  is at the root of all motion
and is due to the simple interaction of the basic units of which
everything is composed. These units manifest as matter in its simplest
form as spherical gradient fields of force. Behind their existence is
the all pervading matrix commonly called ether, which is a complex
geometric structure of pure principle.

A unit of force can only originate and must remain centered upon a
geometric intersection point within the etheric geometric matrix. Due
to the principle of vibration, the cause of which I will not explain
here but will do so upon request, the spheres of force vibrate
continually as an expanding and contracting spherical wave. The
wavefronts are subject to the inverse square law with regards to their
energy density having precisely only one unit of energy to cover a
greater or lesser volume. Each unit of force is identical in all
respects but one. No two units share the same phase of vibration and
position in space.

Only two such units are needed to explain the principle behind the law
of attraction and repulsion. If two adjacent units vibrate in like-
phase relative to a point halfway between their centers then they will
manifest the force of repulsion between them. If they vibrate 180
degrees out of phase with respect to the same frame of reference then
they manifest attraction between them. All other phase relationships
will result in varying degrees of attraction or repulsion. This is due
to simple vector summation of the energy vectors in the vibrating
force fields.  Now no unit of force may be annihilaed and its energy
may not be added to or subtracted from. THEREFORE THE VECTOR SUMMATION
RESULTS IN A SPATIAL DISPLACEMENT OF THE FORCE UNITS UNTIL A BALANCE
OF FORCES IS REACHED.

Matter is composed of groupings of these force units. The manner of
grouping is subject to the geometric harmonic rules of the space
matrix. Its form is established at first by CHAOS principle but may
also be directed by differentiated intelligence once that degree of
structure has evolved. It was stated earlier that no unit of force may
be annihilated, but it may under certain circumstances be dislocated
from existence in one level of the space matrix only to appear in
another. This is possible because the geometric space matrix is
fractal in nature. There are infinitely recursive levels of
fractalization of the space matrix.

This should be sufficient to say in this message.  It should be enough
to raise many questions within anyone who reads it who may be able to
grasp its meaning and implications. I will answer any questions anyone
may have on specific points of this discourse and I may also at a
later time deliver a summary of the evolution and nature of the
geometric etheric space matrix.

p.s. you may wish to keep this in order to make sense of postings
which will follow, so I don't have to repeat these fundamental points.


->  Posted by: god-rosa@cruz.com (Gerald O'Docharty)

---SnetMgr 0.60 [r0001]
 * Origin: i_ufo-l@world.std.com <-> FidoNet (1:330/202)