A: DISCREPENCIES IN PRESENT EM THEORY

There are at least twenty-two major discrepancies presently existing
inconventional electromagnetics theory. This paper presents a summary of those
laws, and is a further commentary on my discussion of scalar longitudinal waves
in a previous paper, "Solutions to Tesla's Secrets and the Soviet Tesla Weapons,"
Tesla Book Company, 1981 and 1982.

I particularly wish to express my deep appreciation to two of my friends and
colleagues who at this time, I believe, wish to remain anonymous. One of the two
is an experimental genius who can produce items that do not work by orthodox
theory.  The second is a master of materials science and electromagnetics theory.
I thank them both for their exceptional contributions and stimuli regarding
potential shortcoming in present electromagnetics theory, and their forbearance
with the many discussions we have held on this and related subjects.

(1) In present electromagnetics theory, charge and charged mass are falsely made
identical. Actually, on a charged particle, the "charge" is the flux of virtual
particles on the "bare particle" of observable mass.  The charged particle is
thus a "system" of true massless charge coupled to a bare chargeless mass.  The
observable "mass" is static, three-dimensional and totally spatial.  "Charge" is
dynamic, four-dimensional or more, virtual and spatiotemporal.  Further, the
charge and observable mass can be de-coupled,  contrary to present theory.
Decoupled charge -- that is, the absence of mass -- is simply what we presently
refer to  as "Vacuum." Vacuum,  spacetime,  and massless charge are all
identical.  Rigorously, we should utilize any of these three as an "ether," as
suggested for vacuum by Einstein himself (see Max Born, Einstiein's Theory of
Relativity, Revised Edition, Dover Publications, New York, 1965, p. 224). And all
three of them are identically an energy -- not energy, but more fundamental
components of energy.

(2) Electrostatic potential is regarded as a purely 3-dimensional spatial stress.
Instead, it is the intensity of a many-dimensional (at least four-dimensional)
virtual flux and a stress on all four dimensions of spacetime.   This is easily
seen, once one recognizes that spacetime is identically masless charged. (It is
not "filled" with charge; rather, it is charge!) Just as, in a gas under
pressure, the accumulation of additional gas further stresses the gas, the
accumulation of charge (spacetime) stresses charge (spacetime).  Further, if
freed from its attachment to mass, charge can flow exclusively in time,
exclusively in space, or in  any combination of the two.  Tesla waves -which are
scalar waves in pure massless charge flux itself -- thus can exhibit
extraordinary characteristics that ordinary vector waves do not possess.  And
Tesla waves have extra dimensional degrees of freedom in which to move, as
compared to vector waves. Indeed, one way to visualize a Tesla scalar wave is to
regard it as a pure oscillation of time itself.

(3)  Voltage and potential are often confused in the electrostatic case, or at
least thought of as "composed of the same thing." For that  reason, voltage is
regarded as "potential drop." This also is not true. Rigorously, the potential
is the intensity of the virtual particle flux at a single point -- whether or not
there is any mass at the point -- and both the pressure and the point itself are
spatiotemporal (4-dimensional) and not spatial (3-dimensional) as  presently
assumed.  Voltage represents the spatial intersection of the difference in
potential between two seperated spatial points, and always implies at least a
miniscule flow of mass current (that is what makes it spatial!).  "Voltage" is
spatial and depends upon the presence of observable mass flow, while scalar
electrostatic potential is spatiotemporal and depends upon the absence of
observable mass flow. The two are not even of the same dimensionality.

(4) The charge of vacuum spacetime is assumed to be zero, when in fact it is a
very high value. Vacuum has no mass, but it has great massless charge and virtual
particle charge flux.  For proof that a charged vacuum is the seat of something
in motion, see G. M. Graham and D. G. Lahoz, "Observation of static
electromagnetic angular momentum in vacuo," Nature, Vol. 285, 15 May 1980, pp.
154-155. In fact, vacuum IS charge, identically, and it is also spacetime, and
at least four-dimensional.

(5) Contrary to its present usage, zero is dimensional and relative in its
context.  A three-dimensional spatial hole, for example, exists in time. If we
model time as a dimension, then the spatial hole has one dimension in 4-space.
So a spatial absence is a spatiotemporal presence.  In the vacuum 4-space, a
spatial nothing is still a something.  The "virtual" concept and mathematical
concept of a derivative are simply two present ways of unconsciously  addressing
this fundamental problem of the dimensional relativity of zero.

(6) The concepts of "space" and "time" imply that spacetime (vacuum) has been
seperated into two parts.  We can only think of a space as "continuing to exist
in time."  To separate vacuum spacetime into two pieces, an operation is
continually required. The operator that accomplishes this splitting operation is
the photon interaction, the interaction of vector electromagnetic energy or waves
with mass.  I have already strongly pointed out this effect and presented a
"raindrop model" or first-order physical change itself in my book, The Excalibur
Briefing, Strawberry Hill Press,  San Francisco, 1980, pp. 128-130.

(7)  "Vector magnetic potential" is assumed to be always an aspect of (and
connected to) the magnetic field.  In fact it is a separate, fundamental  field
of nature and it can be entirely disconnected from the magnetic field.  See
Richard P. Feynman et al, The Feynman Lectures on Physics, Addison-Wesley
Publishing Co., New York, 1964, Vol. II, pp. 15-8 to 15-14. Curiously, this fact
has been proven for years, yet it has been almost completely ignored in the West.
The "(triangle)x"  operator, when applied to the A-field, makes B-field.  If the
(triangle)x operator is not applied, the "freed" A-field possesses much-expanded
characteristics from those presently allowed in the "bound" theory. Specifically,
it becomes a scalar or "shadow vector" field; it is not a normal vector field.

(8) The speed of light in vacuum is assumed to be a fundamental constant of
nature.  Instead it is a function of the intensity of the massless charge flux
(that is, of the magnitude of the electrostatic potential) of the vacuum in which
it moves. (Indeed, since vacuum and masless charge are one and the same, one may
say that the speed of light is a function of the intensity of the spatiotemporal
vacuum!).  The higher the flux intensity (charge) of the vacuum, the faster the
speed of light in it.  This is an observed fact and already shown by hardcore
measurements.  For example,  distinct differences actually exist in the speed of
light in vacuo, when measured on the surface of the earth as compared to
measurements in space away from planetary masses.  In a vacuum on the surface of
the earth, light moves significantly faster.  For a discussion and the
statistics,  see B. N. Belyaev, "On Random Fluctuations of the Velocity of Light
in Vacuum," Soviet Physics Journal, No. 11, Nov. 1980, pp. 37-42 (original in
Russian, translation by Plenum Publishing Corporation.) The Russians have used
this knowledge for over two decades in their strategic psychotronics (energetics)
program; yet hardly a single U.S. scientist is aware of the measured variation
of c in vacuo. In fact, most Western scientists simply cannot believe it when it
is pointed out to them!

(9)  Energy is considered fundamental and equivalent to work.  In fact,  energy
arises from vector processes,  and it can be disassembled into more  fundamental
(anenergy) scalar components,  since the vectors can.  These scalar components
individually can be moved to a distant location without expending work, since one
is not moving force vectors.  There the scalar components can be joined and
reassembled into vectors to provide "free energy" appearing at a distance,  with
no loss in between the initial and distant points. For proof that a vector field
can be replaced by (and considered to be composed of) two scalar fields, see E.
T. Whittaker, Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, Volume 1, 1903, p.
367. By extension, any vector wave can be replaced by two coupled scalar waves.

(10) The classical Poynting vector predicts no longitudinal wave of energy from
a time-varying,  electrically charged source.  In fact, an exact solution of the
problem does allow this longitudinal wave.  See T.  D.  Keech and J.  F.  Corum,
"A New Derivation for the Field of a Time-Varying Charge in Einsteins Theory,"
International Journal of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 20, No. 1, 1981, pp. 63-68 for
the proof.

(11) The present concepts of vector and scalar are severely limited, and do not
permit the explicit consideration of the internal, finer-grained structures of
a vector or  a scalar.   That is,  a  fundamental problem  exists with  the basic
assumptions in the vector mathematics itself. The "space" of a vector field, for
example,  does  not have inter-nested sublevels (subspaces) containing finer
"shadow vectors" or "virtual vectors." Yet particle physics has already
discovered that electrical reality is built that way.  Thus one should actually
use a "hypernumber" theory after the manner of Charles Muses.  A scalar is filled
with (and composed  of)  nested  levels  of other "spaces" containing vectors,
where these sum to "zero" in the ordinary observable frame without  an
observable  vector resultant.  In  Muses' mathematics,  for example,  zero has
real roots.  Real physical devices can be -- and have been -- constructed in
accordance with  Muses' theory.  For an introduction to Muses' profound
hypernumberss approach, see Charles Muses' forward to Jerome Rothstein,
Communication, Ogranization and Science, The  Falcon's Wing Press,  Indian Hills,
Colorado,  1958.  See also Charles Muses',  "Applied Hypernumbers:  Computational
Convepts," Applied  Mathematics  and Computation, Vol. 3, 1976. See also Charles
Muses' "Hypernumbers II", Aoplied Mathematics and Computation, Janurary 1978.

(12)  With the expanded Tesla electromagnetics,  a new conservation of energy law
is required.  Let us recapitulate for a moment.  The oldest law called for the
conservation of mass.  The present law calls for the conservation of "mass and
energy", but not each separately. If mass is regarded as simply another aspect
of energy,  then the present law calls for the conservation of energy.  However,
this assumes that energy is a basic, fundamental concept. Since the energy
concept is tied to work and the movement of vector forces, it implicitly assumes
"vector movement2 to be a "most fundamental" and irreducible concept. But as we
pointed out,  Whittaker  showed that vectors can always be further broken down
into more fundamental coupled scalar components.  Further,  Tesla discovered
that  these "coupled components" of "energy" can be individually separated,
transmitted,  processed,  rejoined,  etc.  This directly implies that energy per
se need not be conserved.  The new law therefore calls for the conservation of
anenergy,  the components of energy. These components may be coupled into energy,
and the energy may be further compacted into mass. It is the sum total of the
(anenergy) components -- coupled and uncoupled -- that is conserved, not the
matter or the energy per se. Further, this conservation of anenergy is not
spatial; rather it is spatiotemporal in a spacetime of at least four or more
dimensions.

(13) Relativity is presently regarded as a theory or statement about fundamental
physical reality. In fact, it is only a statement about FIRST ORDER reality  --
the  reality  that  emerges  from  the  vector  interaction  of electromagnetic
energy with matter.  When we break down the vectors into scalars (shadow vectors
or hypervectors),  we immediatly enter a vastly different,  far more fundamental
reality. In this reality superluminal velocity, multiple universes, travel back
and  forth  in  time,  higher  dimensions,  variation of all "fundamental
constants" of nature,  materialization and dematerialization,  and  violation
of  the "conservation of energy" are all involved. Even our present Aristotlean
logic -- fitted to the photon interaction by vector light as the fundamental
observation mechanism -- is incapable of describing or modeling this more
fundamental reality.  Using scalar waves and scalar interactions as much subtler,
far less limited observation/detection mechanisms, we must have a new
"superrelativity" to describe the expanded electromagnetic reality uncovered by
Nikola Tesla.

(14) "Charge" is assumed to be quantized,  in addition to always occuring with
-- and locked to -- mass. Indeed, charge is not necessarily quantized, just as
it is not necessarily locked to mass.  Ehrenhaft discovered and reported
fractional charges for years,  in the 30's and 40's,  and was ignored.  See
P.A.M.  Dirac, "Development of the Physicist's Conception of Nature",  Sumposium
on the Development of the Physicist's Conception of Nature,  ed.  Jagdish  Merha,
D.  Reidel, Boston,  1973,  pp.  12-14  for  a presentation of some of
Ehrenhaft's results.  Within the last few years Stanford University researchers
have also  positively demonstrated the existence of "fractional charge." For a
layman's description of their work,  see "A Spector Haunting Physics," Science
News,  Vol. 119, January 31, 1981, pp. 68-69. Indeed, Dirac in his referenced
article points out that Millikan himself -- in his original oildrop experiments
-- reported one measurement of fractional charge, but discounted it as probably
due to error.

(15) Presently,  things are always regarded as traveling through normal space.
Thus we use or model only the most elementary type of motion -- that performed
by vector electromagnetic energy.  We do not allow for things to "travel inside
the vector flow itself." Yet,  actually, there is a second, more subtle flow
inside the first,  and a third,  even more subtle flow inside the second,  and
so on.  We may operate inside,  onto, into, and out of energy itself -- and any
anenergy component  of energy.  There are hypervectors and hyperscalars unlimited
,  within the ordinary vectors and scalars we already know.  Further,  these
"interlan flows" can be engineered and utilized, allowing physical reality itself
to be directly engineered, almost without limits.

(16) We always assume everything exists in time.  Actually,  nothing presently
measured exists in time,  because the physicical detection/measurement process
of our present instruments destroys time,  ripping it off and tossing it away --
and thereby "collapsing the wave function." Present scientific methodology thus
is seriously flawed.  It does not yield fundamental (spacetime) truth,  but only
a partial (spatial) truth.  This in turn leads to great scientific oversights.
For example.  mass does not exist in time,  but mass x time (masstime) does.  A
fundamental constant does not exist in time, but "constant x time" does. Energy
does not  exist in time,  but energy x time (action) does.  Even space itself
does not exist in time -- spacetime does.  We are almost always one dimension
short  in every observable we model.  Yet we persist in thinking spatially, and
we have developed instruments that detect and measure spatially only. Such
instruments can never  measure  and  detect the phenomenology of the nested
substrata of time.  By using scalar technology,  however,  less limited
instruments  can  indeed  be constructed  -- and  they have been.  With such new
instruments,  the phenomenology of the new electromagnetics can be explored and
an  engineering  technology developed.

(17) We do not recognize the connection between nested levels of virtual state
(particle physics) and orthogonally rotated frames (hyperspaces).  Actually,  the
two are identical,  as I showed in the appendix to my book, The Excalibur
Briefing, Strawberry Hills Press, San Francisco, 1980, pp. 233-235. A virtual
particle in  the  laborotory  frame  is  an observable particle in a hyperspatial
frame rotated more than one orthogonal turn away.  This  of  course  implies
that  the hyperspatial  velocity  of  all  virtual particles is greater than the
speed of light.  The particle physicist is already deeply  involved  in
hyperspaces  and hyperspatial charge fluxes without realizing it. In other words,
he is using tachyons (particles that move faster than light) without realizing
it.

(18)  Presently  quantum  mechanics  rigorously  states that time is not an
observable,  and therefore it cannot be measured  or  detected.  According  to
this assumption,  one must always infer time from spatial measurements,  because
all detections and measurements are spatial.  With this assumption,  our
scientists prejudice themselves against looking for finer,  subquantal
measurement methodologies and instrumentation. Actually this present limitation
is the result of the type  of electromagnetics we presently know,  where all
instruments (the "measurers") have been interacted with by vector electromagnetic
energy (light).  Every mass  that has temperature (and all masses do!) is
continually absorbing and emitting photons,  and in the process they are
continually connecting to  time  and disconnecting  from  time.  If  time  is
continually being carried away from the detector itself by its emitted photons,
then the detector  cannot   hold   and "detect"  that  which  it  has  just
lost.   With  Tesla electromagnetics,  however, the fundamental limitation of our
present instruments need not apply. With finer  instruments,  we can show there
are an infinite number of levels to "time",  and it is only the "quantum level
time" which is continually being  lost  by vector light (photon) interaction. By
using subquantal scalar waves, instruments can move to deeper levels of time --
in which case the upper levels of time ARE measureable and detectable, in
contradistinction to present assumptions.

(19) In the present physics,  time is modeled as,  and considered to be, a
continuous dimension such as length. This is only a gross approximation. Indeed,
time is  not  like  a  continuous "dimension," but more like a series of
"stiches," each of which is individually made and then ripped out  before  the
next  stitch appears.  "Vector light" photons interact one at a time,  and it is
this interaction with mass that creates quantum change itself. The absorbtion of
a photon -- which  is energy x time -- by a spatial mass converts it to masstime:
the time was added by the photon.  The emission of a photon tears away the time,
leaving behind again a spatial mass.  It is not accidental, then, that time flows
at the speed of light, for it is light which contains and carries time. It is
also not accidental  that  the  photon  IS the individual quantum.  Since all our
instruments presently are continually absorbing and  emitting  photons,  they
are  all "quantized," and they accordingly "quantize" their detections.  This is
true because all detection is totally internal to the detector, and the
instruments only detect  only their own internal changes.  Since these detections
are on a totally granular quantized background,  the detections themselves are
quantized.  The Minkowski  model  is fundamentally erroneous in its modeling of
time,  and for that reason relativity and quantum mechanics continue to resist
all  attempts  to successfully combine them, quantum field theory
notwithstanding.

(20) Presently,  gravitational field and electrical field are considered mutually
exclusive. Actually this is also untrue. In 1974, for example, Santilli proved
that electrical field and gravitational fiend indeed are not mutually exclusive.
In that case one is left with two possibilities: (a) they are totally the same
thing,  or (b) they are partially the same thing. For the proof, see R. M.
Santilli, "Partons and Gravitation: Some Puzzling Questions," Annals of Physics,
Vol. 83,  No.  1, March 1974. With the new Tesla electromagnetics, pure scalar
waves in time itself can be produced electrically, and electrostatics (when the
charge has  been  seperated  from  the mass) becomes a "magic" tool capable of
directly affecting anything that exists in time  --including  the  gravitational
field. Antigravity and the intertial drive are immediate and direct consequences
of the new electromagnetics.

(21)  Presently,  mind  is considered metaphysical,  not a part of physics,  and
not affected by physical means.  Literally,  the prevailing belief  of  Western
scientists is that man is a mechanical robot -- even though relativity depends
entirely upon the idea of the idea of the "observer." Western science today  thus
has essentially become dogmatic,  and in this respect borders on a religion.
Since this "religion," so to speak,  is now fairly well entrenched in its power
in the state,  Western science is turning itself into an oligarchy. But mind
occupies time, and when we measure and affect time, we can directly measure and
affect mind itself.  In the new electromagnetics,  then,  Man regains his dignity
and his humanity by restoring the reality of mind and thought to science. In my
book, The  Excalibur  Briefing,  I have already pointed out the reality of mind
and a simplified way in which it can be modeled to the first order.  With scalar
wave instruments, the reality of mind and thought can be measured in the
laboratory, and parapsychology becomes a working, engineering, scientific
discipline.

(22) Multiple valued basic dimensional functions are either not permitted or
severely discouraged in the present theory.  For one thing,  integrals of
multiple valued derivative functions have the annoying habit of "blowing up" and
yielding erroneous answers, or none at all. And we certainly do not allow
multiple types of time!  This leads to the absurdity of the present
interpretation of relativity, which permits only a single observer (and a single
observation) at a time. So if  one  believes as "absurd" a thing as the fact that
more than one person can observe an apple at the same time,  the present  physics
fails.   However,  the acceptance of such a simple proposition as multiple
simultaneous observation leads to a physics so bizarre and incredible that most
Western physicists have been unable to tolerate it,  much less examine its
consequences.  In the physics that emerges from multiple simultaneous
observation,  all possibilities are real and physical.  There  are  an  infinite
number of worlds,  orthogonal to one another,  and each world is continually
splitting into additional such  "worlds"  at  a stupendous rate.  Nonetheless,
this physics  was worked out by Everett for his doctoral thesis in 1956, and the
thesis was published in 1957. (See Hugh Everett, III, The Many-Worlds
Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: A Fundamental Exposition, with papers by J.
A. Wheeler, B. S. DeWitt, L. N. Cooper and D. Van Vechten, and N.  Graham;  eds.
Bryce S.  Dewitt and Neill Graham,  Princeton Series in Physics,  Princeton
University Press, 1973.) Even though it is bizarre, Everett's physics  is
entirely consistent with the present experimental basis of physics.  The present
electromagnetic theory is constructed for only a single "rodl"  or universe --
or "level." The expanded theory,  on the other hand, contains multiply nested
levels of virtual state charge -- and these levels are identically the same as
orthogonal universes, or "hyperframes." Multiple kinds -- and values -- of time
also exist. The new concept differs from Everett's, however, in that the
orthogonal universes intercommunicate in the virtual state.  That is, an
observable in one universe is always a virtual quantity in each of the other
universes. Thus  one can have multi-level "continuities" and "discontinuities"
simultaneously,  without logical conflict.  It is precisely these levels of
charge  -- these levels of scalar vacuum -- that lace together the discontinuous
quanta generated by the interaction of vector light with mass.

However,  to understand the new electromagnetic reality, one requires a new,
expanded logic which contains the old Aristotlean logic as a subset. I have
already pointed out the new logic in my paper,  "A Conditional Criterion for
Identity,  Leading to a Fourth Law of Logic," 1979,  available from the National
Technical Information Center, AD-A071032.

Even as logic is extended,  quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, and
relativity are drastically changed by the Tesla electrmagnetics, as I pointed out
in my paper, "Solutions to Tesla's Secrets and the Soviet Tesla Weapons," Tesla
Book Company, 1580 Magnolia, Millbrae, CA, 94030, 1980.

The  present  electromagnetics  is  just  a  special  case  of  a  much  more
fundamental electromagnetics discovered by Nikola Tesla, just as Newtonian
physics is  a  special  case of the relativistic physics.  But in the new
electromagnetics case,  the differences between the old and the new are far more
drastic  and profound.

ADDITIONAL REFERENCES

1.  Boren,  Dr.  Lawence  Milton,  "Discovery  of  the Fundamental Magnetic
Charge Arising from the new Conservation of Magnetic  Energy),"  1981/1982
(private communication).  Dr.  Boren has a cogent argument that the positron is
the fundamental unit of magnetic charge.  His theory thus assigns fundamentally
different natures to positive charge and negative charge.  In support of Dr.
Boren, one should point out that the "positive" end of circuits can simply be
"less negative" than the "negative" end.  In other words, the circuit works
simply from higher accumulation of negative charges (the "negative" end) to a
lesser accumulation of negative charges (the "positive" end).  Nowhere needthere
be positive charges (protons,  positrons,  etc.) to make the circuit work.  Dr.
Borens theory, though dramatic  at  first  encounter,  nonetheless bears close
and meticulous examination --  particularly since he has been able to gather
experimental  data  which support his theory and disagree with present theory.

2. Eagle, Albert, "An Alternative Explanation of Relativity Phenomena,
"philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, No. 191, December 1939, pp.
694-701.

3. Ehrenaft, Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "Determination of the Size and Weight of
Single Submicroscopic Spheres of the Order of Magnitude r = 4 x 10(-5) cm. to 5
x  10(-6) cm.,  as well as the Production of Real Images of Submicroscopic
Particles by means of Ultraviolet Light," Phil.  Mag.  and Jour.  of  Sci.,  Vol.
II (Seventh Series), No. 7, July 1926, pp. 30-51.

4.  Ehrenhaft,  Felix and Wasser, Emanuel, "New Evidence of the Existance of
Charges smaller than the Electron - (a) The Micromagnet; (b) The Law of
Resistance; (c) The computation of errors of the Method," Phil. Mag. and Jour.
of Sci., Vol. V (Seventh Series), No. 28, February 1928, pp. 225-241.

5. See also Ehrenhaft's last paper dealing with the electronic charge, in
Philosophy of Science, Vol. 8, 1941, p. 403.

6. McGregor, Donald Rait, The Inertia of the Vacuum: A New Foundation for
Theoretical Physics, Exposition Press, Smithtown, NY, First Edition, 1981, pp.
15-20.

7.  Ignat'ev,  Yu.  G.  and Balakin,  A.  B.,  "Nonliner Gravitational Waves in
Plasma," Soviet Physics Journal,  Vol.  24, No. 7, July 1981, (U.S. Translation,
Consultants Bureau, NY, JAnurary 1982), pp. 593-597.

8.  Yater,  Joseph C.,  "Relation of the second law of thermodynamics to the
power conversion of energy fluctuations," Phys.  Review A,  Vol. 20, no. 4,
October 1979, pp. 1614-1618.

9.  DeSantis,  Romano M.  et al,  "On the Analysis of Feedback Systems With a
Multipower Open Loop Chain," October 1973, available through the Defense
Technical Information Center (AD 773188).

10. Graneau, Peter, "Electromagnetic Jet-Propulsion in the Direction of current
flow," Nature, Vol. 295, 28 Janurary 1982, pp. 311-312

11. "Gravity and acceleration aren't always equivalent," New Scientist, 17
September 1981, p. 723.

12.  Gonyaev,  V.  V.,  "Experimental  Determination of the Free-Fall
Acceleration of a Relativistic Charged Particle.  II.  A Cylindrical Solenoid in
a  Time- Independent Field of Inertial Forces," Izvestiya VUZ,  Fizika, No. 7,
1979, pp. 28-32. English Translation: Soviet Physics Journal, No. 7, 1979, pp.
829-833. If one understands the new, expanded electromagnetics, this Soviet paper
indicates a means of generating antigravity and pure inertial fields.

13. R. Schaffranke, "The Development of Post-Relativistic Concepts in Physics
andAdvanced Technology Abroad," Energy Unlimited, No. 12, Winter 1981, pp. 15-20.

14.  F.  K.  Preikschat,  A Critical look at the theory of Relativity, Library
of Congress Catalogue No. 77-670044. Extensive compilation of measurements of the
speed of light. Clearly shows the speed of light is not constant but changes,
sometimes even daily.